Herzen: "It stands to reason that not a single serious social teaching has ever attacked property rights from the viewpoint of theft." Herzen goes on to call Gagarin's view that serfs should not receive any post-emancipation allotment as an endorsement of theft as the foundation of landowners' rights.
This quote from Psalm ii3 (ii5 in the King James version) appeared on Russian coins under Paul I and later on i8i2 war medals.
In Denis Fonvizin's i782 play
♦ 87 +
Katkov and the Sovereign [1866]
The sovereign could not manage without Katkov and once again appointed him to look after the floodgates of the Moscow sewer, from which filth and sewage have flowed for the past four years, contaminating all Russia. After two weeks, the sovereign could wait no longer and, like a physiologist, decided that a six-week-long cleansing was sufficient for Katkov.1
For his part, Katkov did not reconcile with the sovereign for free:[. . .] Now the Karakozov case will proceed very smoothly. Nekrasov will be satisfied:2
They definitely needed Katkov on the eve of the execution. in order to whip up people's minds, in order for the government itself to believe that it had to feel rage. Without him, Muravyov was incomplete, unfinished— wasn't that the reason that he failed to discover a conspiracy, because he was deprived of the leadership of
But nothing was lost. Katkov, having rested in the summer sun, concentrated his best poison on humiliation and malice, and issued one of his most priceless drops of it when he started up again with an article in issue No. 134 of
[. . .] He speaks of a certain
"World revolution"4
and a nihilist returning from abroad present a great opportunity for the restored detective to tie everything in the world to the Karakozov case, and, to do him justice, he did not forget anyone—not Bakunin,Where will our degradation end? Where will we touch bottom, the limit of our baseness and heartlessness? We go on sinking lower and lower. Recall the howl of indignation that greeted the doctrine of blind obedience, when it was expressed by a Moscow professor,5
butFor us, the state and the dynasty are not a matter of party, and the sovereign for us is not the leader of an armed force, but is designated by birth to lead his entire people, in the calm and indisputable possession of supreme rights. For that reason not only officials, who have been placed in various positions in accordance with executive authority, but every honest citizen must, in good conscience, see
himself as a servant of the sovereign, and concern himself, as our ancestors would say, with his sovereign's affairs, which for every person ought to be a vital matter to him as well.
. If you are eating, you are eating for the sovereign; if you have cholera, the sovereign is sick; if you marry, then the sovereign has married; if you take medicine, then you are treating his majesty!
Notes
Source: "Katkov i Gosudar',"
Katkov was allowed to resume publication of