Английский язык с Агатой Кристи. Убийства по алфавиту

Poirot turned to him. "Quite so. But if you are a sufficiently great and important person, it is necessary that you should be spared small annoyances. If a fly settles on your forehead again and again, maddening you by its tickling — what do you do? You endeavour to kill that fly. You have no qualms about it. You are important — the fly is not. You kill the fly and the annoyance ceases. Your action appears to you sane and justifiable. Another reason for killing a fly is if you have a strong passion for hygiene. The fly is a potential source of danger to the community — the fly must go. So works the mind of the mentally deranged criminal. But consider now this case — if the victims are alphabetically selected, then they are not being removed because they are a source of annoyance to him personally. It would be too much of a coincidence to combine the two."

"That's a point," said Dr. Thompson (это верно = в этом есть смысл). "I remember a case (я помню /один/ случай) where a woman's husband was condemned to death (где мужа /одной/ женщины приговорили к смерти). She started killing the members of the jury one by one (она начала убивать членов суда присяжных одного за другим). Quite a time before the crimes were connected up (достаточное время /прошло/, прежде чем эти преступления были объединены). They seemed entirely haphazard (они казались совершенно случайными)

. But as M. Poirot says (но, как говорит мсье Пуаро), there isn't such a thing as a murderer (не бывает такого убийцы: «такой вещи как убийца») who commits crimes at random (который совершает свои преступления наугад)."

"Either he removes people (или он убирает людей) who stand (которые стоят) (however insignificantly) (сколько бы незначительно /это ни было/ = хоть в в малейшей степени) in his path (на его пути), or else he kills by conviction (либо он убивает по убеждению)

. He removes clergymen (он убирает священников), or policemen (или полицейских), or prostitutes (или проституток) because he firmly believes (потому что он твердо верит) that they should be removed (что они должны быть убраны)."

condemn [kǝnˈdem], haphazard [ˌhæpˈhæzed], clergyman [ˈklǝ:ʤɪmǝn]

"That's a point," said Dr. Thompson. "I remember a case where a woman's husband was condemned to death. She started killing the members of the jury one by one. Quite a time before the crimes were connected up. They seemed entirely haphazard. But as M. Poirot says, there isn't such a thing as a murderer who commits crimes at random."

"Either he removes people who stand (however insignificantly) in his path, or else he kills by conviction. He removes clergymen, or policemen, or prostitutes because he firmly believes that they should be removed."

"That doesn't apply here either (это не подходит сюда) as far as I can see (насколько я могу понять). Mrs. Ascher and Betty Barnard cannot be linked as members of the same class (миссис Эшер и Бетти Барнард не могут быть /логически/ связаны как представители одного и того же класса). Of course (конечно), it's possible (возможно)

that there is a sex complex (что это сексуальный принцип). Both victims have been women (обе жертвы были женщины). We can tell better (мы сможем сказать точнее), of course (конечно), after the next crime (после следующего преступления) —"

"For God's sake, Thompson (ради Бога, Томпсон), don't speak so glibly of the next crime," said Sir Lionel irritably (не говорите столь бойко о следующем преступлении, — сказал Сэр Лайонел раздраженно; glibly — многоречиво; многословно; бойко; to irritate — раздражать). "We're going to do all we can (мы собираемся сделать все, что мы сможем) to prevent another crime (чтобы предотвратить следующее преступление)."