In all this
That significance seemed all the more sinister because the inquisitorial procedure, under which heresy trials were conducted, was as likely to distort the facts as to elicit them; and could also be used to fabricate deeds that were never done at all. Not that the Inquisition itself contributed much to the process. Though the Inquisition perfected the inquisitorial procedure, it never monopolized it; and very few of the heresy trials which, in the course of the fourteenth century, directly prepared the way for the great witch-hunt were conducted by professional inquisitors, whether Dominican or Franciscan. Bishops, special ecclesiastical commissioners and secular judges played a much larger part; and, as we shall see, their motives were very mixed indeed.
10. MAGICIAN INTO WITCH (2)
It seems that the first person to be formally tried for practising ritual magic was Pope Boniface VIII; and he was tried posthumously. This happened in 1310-11, in the aftermath of the pope’s struggle with Philip the Fair of France, and it was the work of Philip’s devoted servant, Guillaume de Nogaret.*
Boniface was the first pope to see the spiritual hegemony of the papacy openly challenged and rejected by a national monarchy.(1)
The immediate source of conflict was the taxation of the clergy. England and France were at war, and Edward I and Philip IV both tried to secure contributions from their clergy towards the cost of the war. This was contrary to the canon law of the time, and Boniface was well within his rights when, in 1296, he issued a bull forbidding any imposition of taxes on the clergy without express licence by the pope. But whereas in England, thanks to the efforts of the archbishop of Canterbury, Robert de Winchelsey, the bull had some effect, Philip was able to introduce countermeasures which practically nullified it in France. And he was quick to follow up his victory: by arresting and imprisoning the bishop of Pamiers, Bernard Saisset, he openly challenged the papal claim, so laboriously established during the preceding two centuries, to control over the clergy. Boniface in turn replied with two bulls, in which he demanded the release of Saisset and reaffirmed the supremacy of the spiritual over the temporal power; but he had underestimated Philip’s determination and ruthlessness.Philip had allies in the Colonna family. That mighty Roman clan hated Boniface bitterly. They were the second oldest of the city’s princely families, and had long been the most powerful. The oldest family was the Caetani, into which Boniface was born; and with his accession to the papal throne it became the most powerful as well. The Colonna saw themselves deprived of their traditional primacy, and more; for Boniface set about breaking their power — excommunicating them, confiscating their estates, even declaring a crusade against them. The Colonna responded by aligning themselves with the king of France and joining in his campaign to discredit the pope. It was the Colonna who first put about the story of Boniface’s demonic contacts.
In March 1301. an assembly of bishops and great lords gathered around Philip the Fair at the Louvre, heard Nogaret denounce the pope as a heretic and demand a general council of the Church to try him; after which Nogaret left for Italy. And while Boniface prepared yet another bull, this time excommunicating the king of France, Nogaret organized a plot to seize him and drag him before a council. The Colonna were his allies, but in effect they ruined the plot. In September the pope was duly seized at his castle at Anagni; but then Sciarra Colonna went too far, insulting and harassing the old man for three days, and also provoking the inhabitants of Anagni to such a point that in the end they rose and rescued the pope. Nogaret was wounded and fled; there could no longer be any question of a general council. On the other hand Boniface was a broken man, mentally and physically; and within a month he was dead.