ГУЛаг Палестины

that "The Church and Government of Ukraine have tried to ease people's fears, suggesting that ... Ukrainians, despite

the allegations, are not genetically anti-Semitic.":

(1) Through what source did Mr. Safer become aware of the allegation that Ukrainians were genetically

anti-Semitic? And what were the qualifications of this source in the field of human genetics, particularly in the

field of the genetic inheritance of cognitive predispositions?

(2) Before broadcasting this allegation, did Mr. Safer verify its plausibility with any responsible geneticist?

(3) What does Mr. Safer mean by "the church of Ukraine"? This reference is as puzzling as would be a reference

to "the church of the United States."

(4) Could Mr. Safer divulge the name of the church representative who issued this denial of a genetic

predisposition to anti-Semitism on the part of Ukrainians, and indicate as well the time and the place of the denial?

(5) Could Mr. Safer similarly identify the Government of Ukraine representative who issued this same denial of a

genetic predisposition to anti-Semitism on the part of Ukrainians - who was it, when, where?

(6) Is Mr. Safer aware of a genetic predisposition to anti-Semitism on the part of any other group - or is this

in his estimation a uniquely Ukrainian phenomenon?

(7) Has Mr. Safer considered the possibility that his own antipathy toward Ukrainians is genetically based? If

not, then how would he account for it? And if not, would Mr. Safer be willing to issue a public statement to the

effect that his anti-Ukrainianism is not genetic in origin?

(8) Could Mr. Safer comment on the possibility that the refusal of CBS personnel to discuss "The Ugly Face of

Freedom" might similarly be genetically-based? If CBS personnel reject the notion that their corporate decisions are

genetically influenced, then could Mr. Safer persuade them to issue a joint statement to this effect, and in

particular denying that they are genetically anti-Ukrainian?

These few and simple questions, it seems to me, serve the useful purpose of establishing what category Mr.

Safer's statement falls into: that of a responsible journalist who picks his words carefully and later stands by them,

or that of a bigot who gets up in front of the camera and begins to ramble off the top of his head - and later selects

muteness as the optimal defense for his irresponsibility.

Sincerely yours,

Lubomyr Prytulak

cc: Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Morley Safer, Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace

HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN

HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN 1473 hits since 23May98

Jordan Letter 6 Jul 19/96 Allowing a fabulist on 60 Minutes

July 19, 1996

Michael H. Jordan

Chairman, Westinghouse Electric Corporation

11 Stanwix Street

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

USA 15222

Dear Mr. Jordan:

When I began reading Simon Wiesenthal in late 1994, I was naive enough to imagine

that my discovery that he had a credibility problem was an original one. Since that

time, however, I have learned that Mr. Wiesenthal's lack of credibility is widely known

and openly acknowledged. For example, on April 28, 1996, I received a letter from a

Jewish faculty member at an American University, from which I quote the following:

I do not doubt for a moment ... that Simon Wiesenthal is a fabulist

which is the fancy literary word for an unmitigated liar. My father

(an Auschwitz inmate) told me many terrible stories about Wiesenthal's

role after the war in the Austrian DP camps. Wiesenthal is of the same

ilk as Elie Wiesel: a secular saint, he can make the most absurd claims

without fear of exposure.

Now the question that I would like to add to the ones that I have already addressed

to you is the following: How did it come to pass that in 1994 a reputable investigative

journalism show featured as its star witness someone who is widely known to be - shall

we say - a "fabulist"?

And from this question springs a second one: How does it come to pass today that a

reputable investigative journalism show, having learned that it has been victimized by

a "fabulist," refuses to take any corrective action?

Yours truly,

Lubomyr Prytulak

cc: Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Morley Safer, Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace, Simon Wiesenthal

HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN 1763 hits since 23May98

Bleich Letter 8 23May98 Please substantiate or retract

If your 60 Minutes testimony concerning violent attacks on Jews by Ukrainians and

motivated by anti-Semitism is true, then it behooves you to substantiate it and in so doing

to remove the doubt which surrounds it. If your 60 Minutes testimony is false, then it

behooves you to retract it. Either option will constitute a step toward restoring your

standing in the eyes of the Ukrainian community, and in ameliorating Ukrainian-Jewish

relations.

Silence is an option only if you are prepared to encourage the conclusion that you spoke

impulsively and irresponsibly, and that you subsequently lacked the courage and integrity

to admit your error.

May 23, 1998

Rabbi Yaakov Dov Bleich

29 Shchekavytska Street

Kiev 254071

Ukraine

Dear Rabbi Bleich: