Интернет как иллюзия. Обратная сторона сети

Sturken, M., and D. Thomas Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears That Shape New Technologies. Philadelphia: Temple Uni-versity Press, 2004.

Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Konen, E., and P. Kommers Eth-nocomputing: ICT in Cultural and Social Context // Communications of the ACM49, no. 1 (2006): 130.

Teich, A. H., ed. Technology and the Future. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson, 2003.

Thorne, K., and A. Kouzmin Cyberpunk-Web 1.0 ‘Egoism’ Greets Group-Web 2.0 “Narcissism”: Convergence, Consumption, and Sur-veillance in the Digital Divide // Administrative Theory & Praxis 30, no. 3 (2008): 299–323.

Thrift, N. New Urban Eras and Old Technological Fears: Reconfiguring the Goodwill of Electronic Things // Urban Studies 33, no. 8 (1996): 1463.

Van Dijck, J., and D. Nieborg Wikinomics and Its Discontents: A Critical Analysis of Web 2.0 Business Manifestos // New Media & Society 11, no. 5 (2009): 855.

Verheul, J., ed. Dreams of Paradise, Visions of Apocalypse: Utopia and Dystopia in American Culture. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2004.

Warf, B., and J. Grimes Counterhegemonic Discourses and the In-ternet // Geographical Review 87, no. 2 (1997): 259–274.

Weightman, G. Signor Marconi’s Magic Box: The Most Remarkable Invention of the 19th Century and the Amateur Inventor Whose Genius Sparked a Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2003.

Wellman, B., and B. Hogan The Immanent Internet // Netting

Citizens: Exploring Citizenship in a Digital Age (2004): 54–80. White, D. M., ed. Popular Culture

. New York: New York Times,

1975.

Williams, R., and E. Williams Television: Technology and Cul-tural Form. New York: Routledge, 2003.

Winner, L. Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978. Winner, L. Social Constructivism: Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty // Science as Culture 3, no. 3 (1993): 427–452.

Winner, L. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Winseck, D. R., and R. M. Pike Communication and Empire: Media, Markets, and Globalization, 1860–1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.

Wise, G. Technological Prediction, 1890–1940. PhD diss., Boston Uni-versity, 1976.

Woolgar, S., and G. Cooper Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence? Moses’ Bridges, Winner’s Bridges and Other Urban Legends in S&TS // Social Studies of Science 29, no. 3 (1999): 433.

Wyatt, S. Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism / In: Hackett, E. J., et al., eds. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

Глава 11. Дело техники

Arendt, H. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1970.

Austin, E. K., and J. C. Callen Reexamining the Role of Digital

Technology in Public Administration: From Devastation to Disclo-sure // Administrative Theory & Praxis 30, no. 3 (2008): 324–341.

Bostrom, N. Technological Revolutions: Ethics and Policy in the Dark

//

Nanotechnology and Society (2007).

Brown, M. B. Can Technologies Represent Their Publics? // Techno-logy in Society 29, no. 3 (2007): 327–338.

Carey, J. W. Historical Pragmatism and the Internet // New Media &

Society 7, no. 4 (2005): 443.

Coyne, R. Wicked Problems Revisited // Design Studies 26, no. 1

(2005): 5–17.

David, E. E., Jr. On the Dimensions of the Technology Controversy //

Daedalus 109, no. 1 (1980): 169–177.