Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии

15 Shariff A. F. et al. (2014) Free will and punishment: a mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science. 25 (8): 1563-1570.

16 The President’s council on bioethics (2004). An overview of the impact of neuroscience evidence in criminal law. Cm.: https:// bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/neuroscience_ evidence.html

17 Sc alia A. (2002) Atkins v. Virginia (00-8452) 556 U.S. 504. Cm.: https://law.comell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZO.html

18 Snead О. C. (2006) Neuroimaging and the courts: standards and illustrative case index. Cm.: http://ncsc.org

19 Talairach P. T., Tournoux P. (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas for the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (P VII). NY: Thicme Medical Publishers.

20 Miller M. B. et al. (2002) Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (8): 1200-1214.

21 Doron C., Gazzaniga M.S. (2009) Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemi-spheric communication. Cortex. 44 (8): 1023-1029.

22 Putman M.C. et al. (2009) Cortical projection topography of the human splenium: hemispheric asymmetry and individual difference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 (8): 1662-1669.

23 Desmurget M. et al. (2009) Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science. 324 (811): 811-813.

24 Brass M., Haggard P. (2008) The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist. 14 (4): 319-325.

25 Brass M., Haggard P. (2007) To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (34): 9141-9145.

26 Kuhn S. et al. (2009) Intentional inhibition: how the “veto-area” exerts control. Human Brain Mapping. 30 (9): 2834-2843.

27 Schaukr F. (2010) Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Trends in Cognitive Science. 14 (3): 101-103.

28 Bond C.F., de Paulo B.M. (2006) Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 10: 214-234.

29 Meisser С. A., Bigham J. С. (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 7 (1): 3-35.

30 Connors E. etal. (1996) Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

31 Turk D. J. et al. (2005) Can perceptual expertise account for the own-race bias in face recognition? A split-brain study. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 22 (7): 877-883.

32 Harris L. T., Fiske S.T. (2006) Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science. 17 (10): 847-853.

33 Wilkinson R. A. (1997) A shifting paradigm: modern restorative justice principles have their roots in ancient cultures. Corrections Today. Cm.: http://drc.ohio.gov