Рациональность. Что это, почему нам ее не хватает и чем она важна

Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. 1974. Who accepts Savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190603.

Soave, R. 2014. Ezra Klein «completely supports» «terrible» Yes Means Yes law. Reason, Oct. 13. https://reason.com/2014/10/13/ezra-klein-completely-supports-terrible/.

Social Progress Imperative. 2020. 2020 Social Progress Index. https://www.socialprogress.org/.

Sowell, T. 1987. A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: Quill.

Sowell, T. 1995. The vision of the anointed: Self-congratulation as a basis for social policy.

New York: Basic Books.

Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0017.1997.tb00062.x.

Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. 1995. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M.

Spinoza, B. 1677/2000. Ethics (G. H. R. Parkinson, trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Stango, V., & Zinman, J. 2009. Exponential growth bias and household finance. Journal of Finance, 64, 2807–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–6261.2009.01518.x.

Stanovich, K. E. 2012. On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stanovich, K. E. 2018. How to think rationally about world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020025.

Stanovich, K. E. 2020. The bias that divides us. Quillette, Sept. 26. https://quillette.com/2020/09/26/the-bias-that-divides-us/.

Stanovich, K. E. 2021. The bias that divides us: The science and politics of myside thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. 2019. The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study. Cognition, 187, 156–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006

.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. 1998. Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 193–230.

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. 2016. The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Statista Research Department. 2019. Beliefs and conspiracy theories in the U. S. — Statistics & Facts. Aug. 13. https://www.statista.com/topics/5103/beliefs-and-superstition-in-the-us/#dossierSummary__chapter5.

Stenger, V. J. 1990. Physics and psychics: The search for a world beyond the senses. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2008. Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1–87. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14282.

Stoppard, T. 1972. Jumpers: A play

. New York: Grove Press.

Stuart, E. A. 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313.

Suits, B. 1978/2014. The grasshopper: Games, life, and utopia (3rd ed.). Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.

Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. 2008. Conspiracy theories. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Papers, 387. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084585.

Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. 2000. Better decisions through science. Scientific American, 283, 82–87.

Sydnor, J. 2010. (Over)insuring modest risks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 177–99. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.4.177.

Sykes, C. J. 2017. How the right lost its mind. New York: St. Martin’s Press.