Читаем The Dyers Hand and Other Essays полностью

Western music declared its consciousness of itself when it adopted time signatures, barring and the metronome beat. Without a stricdy natural or cyclical time, purified from every trace of historical singularity, as a framework within which to occur, the irreversible historicity of the notes themselves would be impossible.

In primitive proto-music, the percussion instruments which best imitate recurrent rhythms and, being incapable of melody, can least imitate novelty, play the greatest role.

The most exciting rhythms seem unexpected and complex, the most beautiful melodies simple and inevitable.

Music cannot imitate nature: a musical storm always sounds like the wrath of Zeus.

A verbal art like poetry is reflective; it stops to think. Music is immediate, it goes on to become. But both are active, both insist on stopping or going on. The medium of passive reflec­tion is painting, of passive immediacy the cinema, for the visual world is an immediately given world where Fate is mistress and it is impossible to tell the difference between a chosen movement and an involuntary reflex. Freedom of choice lies, not in the world we see, but in our freedom to turn our eyes in this direction, or that, or to close them alto­gether.

Because music expresses the opposite experience of pure volition and subjectivity (the fact that we cannot shut our ears at will allows music to assert that we cannot not

choose), film music is not music but a technique for preventing us from using our ears to hear extraneous noises and it is bad film music if we become consciously aware of its existence.

Man's musical imagination seems to be derived almost ex­clusively from his primary experiences—his direct experience of his own body, its tensions and rhythms, and his direct experience of desiring and choosing—and to have very little to do with the experiences of the outside world brought to him through his senses. The possibility of making music, that is, depends primarily, not upon man's possession of an audi­tory organ, the ear, but upon his possession of a sound-pro­ducing instrument, the vocal cords. If the ear were primary, music would have begun as program pastoral symphonies. In the case of the visual arts, on the other hand, it is a visual organ, the eye, which is primary for, without it, the experi­ences which stimulate the hand into becoming an expressive instrument could not exist.

The difference is demonstrated by the difference in our sensation of motion in musical space and visual space.

An increase in the tension of the vocal cords is conceived in musical space as a going "up," a relaxation as a going "down." But in visual space it is the bottom of the picture (which is also the foreground) which is felt as the region of greatest pressure and, as the eye rises up the picture, it feels an increasing sense of lightness and freedom.

The association of tension in hearing with up and seeing with down seems to correspond to the difference between our experience of the force of gravity in our own bodies and our experience of it in other bodies. The weight of our own bodies is felt as inherent in us, as a personal wish to fall down, so that rising upward is an effort to overcome the desire for rest in ourselves. But the weight (and proximity) of other objects is felt as weighing down on us; they are "on top" of us and rising means getting away from their restrictive pres­sure.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Москва при Романовых. К 400-летию царской династии Романовых
Москва при Романовых. К 400-летию царской династии Романовых

Впервые за последние сто лет выходит книга, посвященная такой важной теме в истории России, как «Москва и Романовы». Влияние царей и императоров из династии Романовых на развитие Москвы трудно переоценить. В то же время не менее решающую роль сыграла Первопрестольная и в судьбе самих Романовых, став для них, по сути, родовой вотчиной. Здесь родился и венчался на царство первый царь династии – Михаил Федорович, затем его сын Алексей Михайлович, а следом и его венценосные потомки – Федор, Петр, Елизавета, Александр… Все самодержцы Романовы короновались в Москве, а ряд из них нашли здесь свое последнее пристанище.Читатель узнает интереснейшие исторические подробности: как проходило избрание на царство Михаила Федоровича, за что Петр I лишил Москву столичного статуса, как отразилась на Москве просвещенная эпоха Екатерины II, какова была политика Александра I по отношению к Москве в 1812 году, как Николай I пытался затушить оппозиционность Москвы и какими глазами смотрело на город его Третье отделение, как отмечалось 300-летие дома Романовых и т. д.В книге повествуется и о знаковых московских зданиях и достопримечательностях, связанных с династией Романовых, а таковых немало: Успенский собор, Новоспасский монастырь, боярские палаты на Варварке, Триумфальная арка, Храм Христа Спасителя, Московский университет, Большой театр, Благородное собрание, Английский клуб, Николаевский вокзал, Музей изящных искусств имени Александра III, Манеж и многое другое…Книга написана на основе изучения большого числа исторических источников и снабжена именным указателем.Автор – известный писатель и историк Александр Васькин.

Александр Анатольевич Васькин

Биографии и Мемуары / Культурология / Скульптура и архитектура / История / Техника / Архитектура