The framework of the Marginal Revolution and the neoclassical economics is as follows. Individuals, both buyers and producers, make choices at the margin. Buyers tend to maximize their gains from getting goods up to a certain point where what they gain from an extra unit is balanced by what they give up to obtain it. Thus they maximize and optimize «utility» – the satisfaction which they get while consuming goods and services. In the same way workers provide labour to employers by balancing the gains from offering the marginal unit of their services (the wage they are supposed to get) with the the loss of leisure.
In the same way producers maximize profits by balancing the revenue they generate with the cost of producing the marginal units of a product. They also hire workers up to the point where the cost of additional hands is balanced by the value of output that those hands might manufacture.
So, the neoclassical theories take economic agents into consideration. These agents optimize their gains against all relevant constraints. In this context value results from the collision of unlimited desires with constraints, or scarcity. The decision problems are reconciled in markets, prices being the signals whether the conflicting desires can be reconciled.
At some price of refrigerators, for example, I want to buy a new refrigerator. At that same price others may also want to buy refrigerators. But producers may not want to manufacture as many refrigerators as all buyers want. So, this may lead us to «bid up» the price of refrigerators, ousting out some buyers and encouraging some producers to produce more of the product we want. The price changing, the imbalance between buy orders and sell orders is reduced. This is how optimization under constraint and market interdependence lead to an economic equilibrium. This is the neoclassical outlook.
Слова и выражения:
accept
– приниматьbreakthrough
– прорыв, открытиеcollision
– столкновениеconstraint
– ограничение, сдерживающий факторdesire
– желаниеequilibrium
– равновесиеframework
– конструкция, структураgain
– приобретение; приобретатьgradually
– постепенноimbalance
– дисбалансinterdependence
– взаимозависимостьinvolve
– включать в себя, вовлекать, втягиватьleisure
– досуг, отдыхmargin
– предел, маржаmarginal
– предельный, маргинальныйmaximize
– увеличиватьneoclassical
– неоклассическийoptimize
– оптимизироватьoutlook
– взгляд, мировоззрениеproperty
– свойство, качествоreconcile
– примирятьrelevant
– соответствующий, соотносимыйscarcity
– недостатокsignal
– сигналsubstitute
– заменять, подменятьtend
– стремиться, следовать тенденции, устанавливать тенденциюutility
– полезность, практичность, выгодностьvalue theory
– теория стоимостиtwo-fold
– двустороннийcame to be called
– стал называтьсяMarginal Revolution
– Маржиналистская Революция (маржинализм – теория предельной полезности и производительности)extra unit
– дополнительная единица (продукции)give up
– оставлять, бросатьtake into consideration
– принимать во вниманиеeconomic agents
– участники экономической жизни, экономических процессовin this context
– в данном контекстеbid up
– набавлять ценуoust out
– вытеснятьbuy order
– заказ на продажуsell order
– заказ на покупкуAnswer the questions:
1. What view did the economists in the XIXth century accept?
2. What did the value of a product depend on, in accord with the classical value theory?
3. How were products distributed, according to this theory?
4. Whose ideas did the classical theory have roots in?
5. Why didn\'t the classical theory work in practice?
6. What theories were the classical theories substituted by?
7. What is value, in the neoclassical view?
8. Where do buyers and sellers make their choices, according to the neoclassical view?
9. What is «utility», in the neoclassical sense of the word?
10. Who do neoclassical theories take into consideration?Rational Expectations Theory