This profound cause—the only thing that does not change—is, according to Dienach, the thirst of the spirit and soul for the
Reinforcing and activating all these inherent human spiritual abilities, once done extensively and for a sufficient amount of time (faithful and persistent self-cultivation for thousands of years), could, according to Dienach, exercise decisive influence on the forms of spiritual life and generally the cultural life for very long periods of time. It could also gradually form a peculiar civilisation, which would leave, one would say, its own distinct mark. That distant future age of civilisation that he narrates—which he
For instance, the ancient Chinese civilisation, monolithic and isolated, was mainly characterised by its excessive devotedness to tradition. The Egyptian civilisation of the time of the Pharaohs and high priests had focused on life after death. The ancient Jewish civilisation, as well as the later Islamic one, was of evident religious nature. The Greek civilisation of classical antiquity centred on the worship of natural beauty and was infused with unparalleled spiritual elements, thanks to the Socratic teaching of self-discipline, morality, virtue, mutual respect and the incomparable principles and convictions of the Platonic Ideal. It was a civilisation with a sense of proportion and beauty, an artistic and aesthetic civilisation above all.
The civilisation of the Italian Renaissance had certain characteristic features such as the revival of classical texts, the thirst for free thinking, the elevation of aesthetic consciousness and artistic creation using themes principally taken from the Christian tradition. The 19th century German civilisation created an entire universe of harmony and, besides, brought Europe an unprecedented development and acme in scientific thought and philosophical thinking.
Generally, within the millennial turnings of the wheel of history, various tendencies prevail. At times, it is rationalism, the materialistic ideas and the mentality of research, observation and experimentation on behalf of natural sciences—the almightiness of the laboratory. At others, it is aesthetic consciousness, the sense of beauty, the development, that is, of the sense of good taste. In other moments in history, it is the conquests of the technical universe, the comforts and the mass production of standardised industrial products (the popularisation of the application of inventions, the material abundance of means and the democratisation of comforts). Then, some other times, it is fanaticism, intolerance and the ideological prejudice against spiritual or political preachings or even religious past ones. Finally, there are times when it is intellectualism in thought and in every other expression of social life.
A possible one-sided reinforcement of cognitive functions—only of the mind and not of the emotion—could, Dienach somewhere says, create a materially almighty race, in the course of millennia, of incredible technological achievements, of a remarkable progress in natural sciences and their technical applications. However, such one-sided progress would generate a barbaric race in terms of inner cultivation, with no gentleness of mores, with no inner culture, with a massive void regarding the soul, moral values and emotions.