Машина знаний. Как неразумные идеи создали современную науку

66. Herschel, J. F. W. Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green; John Taylor, 1830.

67. Hobbes, T. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London: Andrew Crooke, 1651.

68. Holton, G. “Subelectrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 9 (1978): 161–224.

69. Hossenfelder, S. Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. New York: Basic Books, 2018.

70. Jahren, H. Lab Girl. New York: Knopf, 2016.

71. Jasanoff, S. “Transparency in Public Science: Purposes, Reasons, Limits.” Law and Contemporary Problems 69 (2006): 21–45.

72. Johnson, G. Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics. New York: Knopf, 1999.

73. Keller, A. “Has Science Created Technology?” Minerva 22 (1984): 160–82.

74. Kennefick, D. “Testing Relativity from the 1919 Eclipse – A Question of Bias.” Physics Today 62, no. 3 (2009): 37–42.

75. Keynes, J. M. “Newton, the Man.” In The Royal Society Newton Tercentenary Celebrations 15–19 July 1946, edited by the Royal Society (Great Britain), 27–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1947.

76. Kitcher, P. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2011. Kragh, H. Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton.

77. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

78. Kuhn, T. S. “The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research.” In Scientific Change: Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social, and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, from Antiquity to the Present, edited by A. C. Crombie, 347–69. New York: Basic Books, 1963.

79. Kuhn, T. S. The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

80. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

81. Kuhn, T. S. “What Are Scientific Revolutions?” In The Probabilistic Revolution. Vol. 1. Edited by L. Krüger, L. J. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 7–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.

82. Kulp, S. A., and B. H. Strauss. “New Elevation Data Triple Estimates of Global Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding.” Nature Communications 10, 4844 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41467–019–12808-z.

83. Lakatos, I. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

84. Lamichhaney, S., F. Han, M. T. Webster, L. Andersson, B. R. Grant, and P. R. Grant. “Rapid Hybrid Speciation in Darwin’s Finches.” Science 359 (2018): 224–8.

85. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

86. Lawrence, D. H. Studies in Classic American Literature. New York: Thomas Seltzer, 1923.

87. Leibniz, G. W. Philosophical Essays. Translated and edited by R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.

88. Leroi, A. M. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science. New York: Viking, 2014. Lindberg, D. C. The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

89. Lindley, D. Degrees Kelvin: A Tale of Genius, Invention, and Tragedy. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry, 2004.

90. Macleay, W. S. Horae Entomologicae: or, Essays on the Annulose Animals. London: S. Bagster, 1819.