Неразумная обезьяна. Почему мы верим в дезинформацию, теории заговора и пропаганду

Joint Committee on Health. Report on Scrutiny of the Cannabis for Medicinal Use Regulation Bill 2016. Houses of the Oireachtas, 2017.

Глава 8. Бен Ладен Шрёдингера

G. Beale. The cult of T. D. Lysenko: thirty appalling years // Science Journal (1969).

L. Festinger. When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World. Harper-Torch-books, 1956.

M. R. Allen et al. IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report-climate change 2014 synthesis report (2014).

P. Diethelm, M. McKee. Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond? // European Journal of Public Health 19.1 (2009): 2–4.

S. Weart. Global warming: How skepticism became denial // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67.1 (2011): 41–50.

S. Lewandowsky, K. Oberauer, G. E. Gignac. NASA faked the moon landing – therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science // Psychological Science 24.5 (2013): 622–33.

D. R. Grimes. Denying climate change isn’t scepticism – it’s “motivated reasoning” // The Guardian (2014).

D. M. Kahan et al. Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government // Behavioural Public Policy 1.1 (2017): 54–86.

Глава 9. Память остается

National Research Council. Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification

. National Academies Press, 2015.

O. Sacks. Speak, Memory // New York Review of Books (2013).

E. F. Loftus, J. E. Pickrell. The formation of false memories // Psychiatric Annals 25.12 (1995): 720–725.

E. F. Loftus. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory // Learning & Memory 12.4 (2005): 361–366.

N. Schreiber et al. Suggestive interviewing in the McMartin Preschool and Kelly Michaels daycare abuse cases: A case study // Social Inf luence 1.1 (2006): 16–47.

Глава 10. Кинжал, измышленный воображеньем

T. E. Moore. Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony: Lessons from the Judas Priest Trial // Skeptical Inquirer, 20 (6) (1996).

O. Blanke et al. Neurological and robot-controlled induction of an apparition // Current Biolog y 24.22 (2014): 2681–2686.

J. A. Cheyne et al. Hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations during sleep paralysis: neurological and cultural construction of the night-mare // Consciousness and Cognition 8.3 (1999): 319–337.

M. E. Chevreul. De la baguette divinatoire: du pendule dit explorateur et des tables tournantes, au point de vue de l’histoire de la critique et de la meth-ode experimentale. Mallet-Bachelier, 1854.

C. A. Mercier. Automatic Writing // British Medical Journal (1894): 198–199.

M. P. Mostert. An activist approach to debunking FC // Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (2014): 203–210.

D. L. Wheeler et al. An experimental assessment of facilitated communication // Mental Retardation 31.1 (1993): 49.

M. P. Mostert. Facilitated communication and its legitimacy – Twenty-first century developments // Exceptionality

18.1 (2010): 31–41.

Глава 11. Большие надежды

B. R. Forer. ‘The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psycholog y 44.1 (1949): 118.

S. Carlson. A Double-blind test of astrology // Nature 318, (1985), 419–425.

D. J. Pittenger. Measuring the MB TI… and coming up short // Journal of Career Planning and Employment 54.1 (1993): 48–52.

G. Montgomery, I. Kirsch. Mechanisms of placebo pain reduction: an empirical investigation // Psychological Science 7.3 (1996): 174–176.

E. Ernst. The attitude against immunisation within some branches of complementary medicine // European Journal of Pediatrics 156.7 (1997): 513–515.

G. J. Rubin, R. Nieto-Hernandez, S. Wessely. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly “elec-tromagnetichypersensitivity”): An updated systematic review of provocation studies // Bioelectromagnetics 31 (1) (2010).