Сбитые с толку. Почему наши интуитивные представления о мире часто ошибочны

Ranney, M. A., and Clark, D. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 49–75.

Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G., Tenenbaum, H. R., Koepke, M. F., and Fischer, K. W. (2007). Transient and robust knowledge: Contextual support and the dynamics of children’s reasoning about density. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 98–108.

Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., and Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 1–34.

Renken, M. D., and Nunez, N. (2010). Evidence for improved conclusion accuracy after reading about rather than conducting a belief-inconsistent simple physics experiment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 792–811.

Renken, M. D., and Nunez, N. (2013). Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding. Learning and Instruction, 23, 10–23.

Riedel, S. (2005). Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 18, 21–25.

Rosenberg, R. D. (2008). Infants’ and young children’s representations of objects and non-cohesive entities: Implications for the core cognition hypothesis (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Cann, H. M., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L. A., and Feldman, M. W. (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 298, 2381–2385.

Rosengren, K. S., Miller, P. J., Gutierrez, I. T., Chow, P. I., Schein, S. S., and Anderson, K. N. (2014). Children’s understanding of death: Toward a contextualized and integrated account. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 1–162.

Roser, M. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Handy, T. C., Dunbar, K. N., and Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). Representations of physical plausibility revealed by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 20, 1081–1086.

Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J. D., and Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25–47.

Roughgarden, J. (2004). Evolution’s rainbow: Diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rozenblit, L., and Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562.

Rozin, P (1990). Development in the food domain. Developmental Psychology, 26, 555–562.

Rozin, P, Fallon, A., and Augustoni-Ziskind, M. (1985). The child’s conception of food: The development of contamination sensitivity to «disgusting» substances. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1075–1079.

Rozin, P., Millman, L., and Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703–712.

Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1996). Mental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children’s cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.

Samarapungavan, A. and Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21, 147–177.

Sanchez, C. A., and Wiley, J. (2014). The role of dynamic spatial ability in geoscience text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 31, 33–45.

Sanner, M. A. (2001). People’s feelings and beliefs about receiving transplants of different origins: Questions of life and death, identity, and nature’s border. Clinical Transplantation, 15, 19–27.

Santos, L. R. (2004). Core knowledges: A dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a non-human primate? Developmental Science, 7, 167–174.

Santos, L. R., and Hauser, M. D. (2002). A non-human primate’s understanding of solidity: Dissociations between seeing and acting. Developmental Science, 5, F1–F7.

Santos, L. R., Seelig, D., and Hauser, M. D. (2006). Cotton-top tamarins’ (Saguinus oedipus) expectations about occluded objects: A dissociation between looking and reaching tasks. Infancy, 9, 147–171.