sometimes the chamberlain Basil Chulkov, sometimes Her Maj-
esty’s eternal suitor Simon Naryshkin, sometimes Shubin (a pri-
vate in her guard), and sometimes the indestructible and ever so
accommodating Alexis Razumovsky, the most assiduous and hon-
ored of all.
The people around Elizabeth called him “the night emperor.”
She often deceived him, but in the end she could never stand to
give him up. Only in his arms could she feel that she was both
dominant and dominated at the same time. He had a deep voice,
< 153 >
and used to be the cantor in the imperial chapel; he spoke with a
heavy Ukrainian accent, only said simple things, and — a rarity in
the tsarina’s entourage — never asked for favors. At most he con-
sented to have his mother, Natalya Demianovna, share the fortune
that he was enjoying. He was concerned that contact with the
court would harm a woman of her condition, accustomed to dis-
cretion and poverty. Natalya Demianovna’s first visit to the palace
was an event. Seeing this
ments, wedged into a formal gown, Elizabeth forgot all modesty
and exclaimed with gratitude, “Blessed be the fruit of your en-
trails!” But her lover’s mother was not an ambitious woman.
Hardly having been named lady-in-waiting and installed in the
palace, “Razumikhina”2, as she was contemptuously called behind
her back, requested permission to leave the court. Returning to
obscurity, sheltered from scandalmongers, she once again donned
her peasant clothing.
Alexis Razumovsky understood very well how frightened
this “woman of the people” must have been by the excesses of
those at the top. He insisted that Her Majesty spare his mother
the signs of honor that others around her were so keen to receive.
As for himself, in spite of his rising stature and fortune, he refused
to consider himself worthy of the good fortune that had come to
him. The more his influence over Elizabeth increased, the less he
wished to be involved in politics.
His lack of interest in intrigues and rewards only gave his
imperial mistress greater confidence in him. She made many pub-
lic appearances with him, and she was proud of this companion
whose only claim to respect from the nation were the titles that
she had given him. When she presented him she was presenting
contemporaries for their assessment. He owed his elevation to
< 154 >
her, and she was gratified to see her favorite receiving further hon-
ors. Scornful as he was of official distinctions, she was delighted,
as much for herself as for him, when he was named count of the
Holy Roman Empire by Charles VII. When she made him a field
marshal, he smiled ironically and thanked her in terms that give a
clear picture of the man he was: “Liz, you can do whatever you
like, but you will never make anyone take me seriously, even as a
simple lieutenant.”3
Soon, all the court considered Razumovsky not only the
“night emperor” but a Prince Consort, as legitimate as if his union
with Elizabeth had been consecrated by a priest. Moreover, ru-
mors had been circulating for months that they had married, in
great secrecy, in the church of the little village of Perovo, outside
of Moscow. The couple supposedly had been blessed by Father
Dubiansky, the empress’s chaplain and guardian of her deepest
secrets. No courtier attended these clandestine nuptials. Nothing
changed, outwardly, in the tsarina’s relations with her favorite. If
Elizabeth had wanted this secret sacrament, it was simply to keep
God on her side. Debauched and unruly as her lifestyle was, she
needed to believe that the Almighty was with her in her everyday
life and in her exercise of power. This illusion of a supernatural
partnership helped her maintain some semblance of equilibrium
in the midst of the many contradictions that shook her from all
sides.
From that day forward, Razumovsky visited her at night
with impunity. This new situation should have encouraged them
to exchange political opinions with as much ease and confidence
as their caresses, but Razumovsky was still hesitant to abandon
his neutrality. However, while he never imposed his will on Eliza-
beth when it came to making fundamental decisions, she was well
aware of his preferences. Guided by his instinct as a man of the
earth, he was generally supportive of Chancellor Bestuzhev’s na-
< 155 >
tionalist ideas. In such times, when some states are at war and
others are preparing for it, and when forging alliances is the prin-
cipal occupation of all the foreign ministries, it was difficult to see
clearly where Russia’s best interests lay. What is clear, in any
case, is that the hostilities between Russia and Sweden
(recklessly started in 1741 under the regency of Anna Leo-
poldovna) came to an end. The Russians, led by Generals Lascy
and Keith, won several victories over the Swedes and a peace