The judge's eyes fall weary on the prosecutor. 'Counsel -
'So Doctor – sufferers of the disorder you mention, am I right in thinking they're
'
The prosecutor turns to the jury and smirks. I just stay impassive. 'Overruled,' says the judge. 'Your client is not being referred to.' He nods for Goosens's answer.
'Sufferers have a much higher threshold of arousal than you or I,' says Goosens, swishing his cheeks at the prosecutor. 'Their appetite for thrills can drive them to ever-greater risk, without regard for the consequences.'
'Thrills such as murder?'
'Yes.'
The prosecutor lets that one sit awhile, on the floor of the court. The stench of it wafts jurywards. He turns to look at me for his next question to Goosens. 'And tell us – does sexuality play a part in such behavior?'
'Sex is our most powerful drive. Naturally, it's a primary conduit for behaviors directed toward the acquisition and maintenance of power over others. And in the antisocial mind – death and sex are common bedfellows.'
'And how might these traits arise, in layman's terms?'
'Well, a fixation can develop in childhood…'
'A fixation for, let's say – a woman?' The prosecutor lowers his face, but swivels his eyes up to the witness stand.
'Well, yes, the object of male fixation is most often female.'
'A sociopath might kill a woman for thrills?'
'Yes, or he might – kill
'No further questions.'
Macaroni cheese for lunch today. And bread. Later, it curdles high in my gut as my attorney steps up to the witness box, smiling.
'Oliver Goosens, how are you today?'
'Just fine, thank you.'
'Tell me, Doc – do these antisocial disorders worsen with age?'
'Not necessarily – to be classified, the characteristics must have been in place by the age of fifteen.'
'Is the condition still treatable at fifteen?'
'Most disorders remain treatable at any age, although with true antisocial personalities the results are questionable.'
'You mean they can't be successfully treated?'
'That's the prevailing evidence.'
My attorney takes a little walk around the court, head down, thinking. Calculating Pi, probably. Then he stops. 'In your report to the Martirio Local Court, you recommended my client attend outpatient treatment with you, rather than be detained?'
Goosens looks up at the judge. The judge nods for him to answer. 'Yes,' says Goosens.
'Kind of a light-handed approach for an untreatable psychopath – don't you think?'
Irritation skips over the doctor's face. 'These cases can be hard to diagnose in one session.'
'You didn't have a problem implying it for the jury just now.' Brian gives a hooshy little laugh. 'And, Doctor, in terms of the sexual connotations you mention – would it be equally possible for an antisocial mind to fixate on a man, or – boy?' He starts to pace a narrowing circle around Goosens.
'Of course. Jeffrey Dahmer is a good example…'
'But what would distinguish regular homosexual desire from pathological fixation?'
'Well, um – consent. A pathological deviant would trick or force his targets, without reference to their wishes.'
'So, a person who forced his desires on boys – would be a psychopath?'
'Certainly could be, yes.'
Goosens doesn't look so smug anymore. My attorney finishes his circling, then nails him with an eye that says, 'Let's play ball'. 'Oliver Goosens,' he muses. 'Ever hear the name "Harlan Perioux"?'
Goosens turns white.
Brian turns to the jury. 'Ladies and gentlemen – Judge – please excuse my language here.' He moves to the witness stand, and leans into Goosens's face. 'If not, perhaps you've heard of an internet site called
'Excuse me?'
'A man named Harlan Perioux was indicted in Oklahoma for procuring and corrupting teenage boys for that website – tell us please, under oath – is there something you know about it?'
'I don't have to answer that.'
Brian smiles a lazy smile. He lifts some documents off his table, and hoists them into the air. 'I have exhibits showing that you, Oliver Goosens, previously went by the name of Harlan Perioux.' A sharp murmur breaks through the court. 'I put it to you, Doctor, that five years ago you were indicted under that name, on four charges relating to the corruption of boys for your pornographic website.'
'Charges were never proven.'
'And I further suggest to you, Doctor, that you own and operate that site still, under the name
Somebody in the back stifles a snort of laughter. The judge scowls.
'Am I right, Doctor?' Brian says it slow and clear. 'Yes – or – no?'