Читаем Вредно для несовершеннолетних полностью

But pedophiles and their lobbyists were not bad enough for some, so worse co-conspirators were proposed. While Reisman linked me to Hitler, a NewsCorridor columnist named Gregory J. Hand located me at the other end of the political spectrum, as a “bisexual Marxist Jewess,” apparently part of the international Jewish conspiracy that not only controls the banks and the press, but also is “promoting adult-child sex.” McCain’s Concerned Women piece offered this bit of commentary: “A Google search reveals that [Levine] has described herself as a ‘red-diaper baby’—that is, the child of Communist Party activists—and a socialist herself, who has written that she is ‘allergic to religion.’ Very interesting, but not a word of it in the New York Times or USA Today.” This revelation, along with the writer’s insinuation that the press was covering it up, evoked a charming bit of nostalgia. The John Birch Society and Christian Crusade in the 1960s called the Republican Quaker founding presi­dent of SIECUS, Mary Calderone, and her colleagues “atheists” and “one-worlders,” a code word for communists. They also frequently pointed out how many sex educators and sexologists were Jews (who were also suspected of traitorous sentiments) and declared that together these people were softening up America’s youth for conver­sion by the godless Reds. When the “red-diaper” comment came up at the end of a long phone interview, I broke the news to McCain: “I hate to tell you, Rob, but the Communist Party’s position on sex was about as progressive as the Catholic Church’s.”

Marginalization

The claim about Rind, Elders, SIECUS, and me is not only that we have a political agenda, but that it is a radical one held by a small minority. Even sympathetic reporters played up this alleged eccen­tricity. “Their theories are explosive,” read the blurb of an even-handed piece in the LA Times. “A handful of maverick[s]...” Don Feder in the Boston Herald

repeated the claim that sex educators, and I as their fellow traveler (see Guilt by Association), are libertines and hedonists: “Levine thinks we interfere with the primary mission of sex educators - teaching kids that whatever feels good by defini­tion is good.” Actually, sex-ed has always been an eminently moder­ate project, since its inception teaching kids to wait until marriage. Moreover, in survey after survey, upwards of 80 percent of American parents say they want comprehensive sexuality education of the kind Feder decries.

Another rhetorical tactic is to quote something that would sound reasonable to most people and call it perverted. Among “Levine’s bizarre theories” that Knight kept invoking was the “theory” that children are sexual from birth and, left to their own devices, will probably engage in masturbation and sex play. This “bizarre theo­ry” is explicitly accepted by every reputable developmental psychol­ogist and anthropologist in the industrialized world and implicitly by most everyone else in the world.

While the object of an attack is portrayed as a wild-eyed radical, the critics are described as reasonable, and legion. “In Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex, its author, Judith Levine, says parents should recognize their children as sexual beings and that in some instances, sex between adults and minors may actually be a good thing,” Greta Van Susteren introduced me on her show, misrepresenting the book. She added: “As you may ex­pect this has parents around the country in a uproar.”

The “critics” also appear to be politically unaffiliated. In the New York Times, Knight was identified as a fellow of the Heritage Foundation, not as “the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank,” its own self-description. Only rarely in the scores of articles mentioning Concerned Women for America was the organization identified as it identifies itself: one that “seeks to instill Biblical prin­ciples in public policy at all levels.” During the time I was featured on CWA’s home page, so was a campaign to halt the teaching of “the lie of evolution” in public schools and an indictment of the Bush Administration’s “homosexual agenda,” evidenced by its hiring of a few members of the gay Log Cabin Republicans. Without such de­tails, Concerned Women for America sounds moderate and matron­ly, another League of Women Voters.

The point of pushing someone to the margins is not only to dis­credit her in others’ eyes, but to mobilize her own shame, even fear. And it works. Feeling despised as an outsider, one grasps at main­stream status.

Not married? I’ve been in a relationship for eleven years!

Have suspiciously short hair and don’t wear skirts? My partner is a man!

No children? Wait, wait! I’m a doting aunt!

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Календарные обряды и обычаи в странах зарубежной Европы. Зимние праздники. XIX - начало XX в.
Календарные обряды и обычаи в странах зарубежной Европы. Зимние праздники. XIX - начало XX в.

Настоящая книга — монографическое исследование, посвященное подробному описанию и разбору традиционных народных обрядов — праздников, которые проводятся в странах зарубежной Европы. Авторами показывается история возникновения обрядности и ее классовая сущность, прослеживается формирование обрядов с древнейших времен до первых десятилетий XX в., выявляются конкретные черты для каждого народа и общие для всего населения Европейского материка или региональных групп. В монографии дается научное обоснование возникновения и распространения обрядности среди народов зарубежной Европы.

Людмила Васильевна Покровская , Маргарита Николаевна Морозова , Мира Яковлевна Салманович , Татьяна Давыдовна Златковская , Юлия Владимировна Иванова

Культурология