Bowler P. J.
Evolution: the History of an Idea. Berkeley et al., 1984.–: The Non-Darwinian Revolution. Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore; London, 1988.
Brändli S. u. a.
(Hg.). Zum Fall machen, zum Fall werden. Wissensproduktion und Patientenerfahrung in Medizin und Psychiatrie des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt a. M.; New York, 2009.Brandt Ch
. Metapher und Experiment. Von der Virusforschung zum genetischen Code. Göttingen, 2004.Brendel E
. Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments // Dialectica. 2004. № 58/1. P. 89–108.Brintlinger A
. Writing about Madness: Russian Attitudes toward Psyche and Psychiatry, 1887–1907 // Madness and the Mad in Russian Culture / Ed. by A. Brintlinger and I. Vinitsky. Toronto et al., 2007. P. 173–191.Brooks P.
Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York, 1984.Brown J. R.
The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London; New York, 1991.Brown J. V.
The Professionalization of Russian Psychiatry: 1857–1911. Ph. D. Diss. University of Pennsylvania, 1981.–: Psychiatrists and the State in Tsarist Russia // Social Control and the State: Historical and Comparative Essays / Ed. by S. Cohen et al. Oxford, 1983. P. 267–287.
–: Revolution and Psychosis: The Mixing of Science and Politics in Russian Psychiatric Medicine, 1905–13 // Russian Review. 1987. № 46. P. 283–302.
–: Social Influences on Psychiatric Theory and Practice in Late Imperial Russia // Health and Society in Revolutionary Russia / Ed. by S. G. Solomon et al. Bloomington; Indianapolis, 1990. P. 27–44.
–: Heroes and Non-Heroes: Recurring Themes in the Historiography of Russian-Soviet Psychiatry // Discovering the History of Psychiatry / Ed. by M. S. Micale and R. Porter. New York; Oxford, 1994. P. 297–307.
–: Professionalization and Radicalization: Russian Psychiatrists Respond to 1905 // Russia’s Missing Middle Class: The Professions in Russian History / Ed. by H. D. Balzer. Armonk, 1996. P. 143–167.
Buckler J. A.
Mapping St. Petersburg. Imperial Text and Cityshape. Princeton, 2005.Bulferetti L
. Cesare Lombroso. Torino, 1975.Bulhof I. N.
The Language of Science: A Study of the Relationship between Literature and Science in the Perspective of a Hermeneutical Ontology, with a Case Study of Darwin’s The Origin of Species. Leiden et al., 1992.Burbank J., Cooper F
. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, 2010.Burgener P.
Die Einflüsse des zeitgenössischen Denkens in Morels Begriff der «dégénérescence». Zürich, 1964.Busch W
. Konstantin Merežkovskijs Menschheitstraum // Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen. 1966. № 202. S. 441–446.Bynum W., Neve M
. Hamlet on the Couch // American Scientist. 1986. № 74/4. P. 390–396.Campbell J. A.
The Invisible Rhetorician: Charles Darwin’s «Third Party» Strategy // Rhetorica. 1989. № 7/1. P. 55–85.–: Scientific Discovery and Rhetorical Invention: The Path to Darwin’s Origin // The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry / Ed. by H. W. Simons. Chicago; London, 1990. P. 58–90.
–: Charles Darwin: Rhetorician of Science // Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies / Ed. by R. A. Harris. Mahwah, 1997. P. 3–17.
Canguilhem G
. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris, 1966.Capuana L
. Gli «ismi» contemporanei [1896]. Milano, 1973.Carroll J
. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York; London, 2004.Cartron L
. Degeneration and «Alienism» in Early Nineteenth-Century France // Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture, 1500–1870 / Ed. by S. Müller-Wille and H.-J. Rheinberger. Cambridge, A. M. London, 2007. P. 155–174.Cassirer E
. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Bd. 4 (Von Hegels Tod bis zur Gegenwart [1832–1932]). Darmstadt, 1994.Ceccarelli L
. Shaping Science with Rhetoric. The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger and Wilson. Chicago; London, 2001.Chamberlin J. E., Gilman S. L.
(eds.). Degeneration: The Dark Side of Progress. New York, 1985.Chevrel Y
. Le Naturalisme. Paris, 1982.–: Probleme einer komparatistischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung – am Beispiel des Naturalismus in den europäischen Literaturen // Germanistik und Komparatistik. DFG-Symposion 1993 / Hg. von H. Birus. Stuttgart, 1995. S. 466–480.
Childs D. J.
Modernism and Eugenics: Woolf, Eliot, Yeats, and the Culture of Degeneration. Cambridge, 2001.Clark W
. Narratology and the History of Science // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 1995. № 26/1. P. 1–71.Crook P.
Darwin’s Coat-Tails. Essays on Social Darwinism. New York et al., 2007.