Regardless of the way in which return on capital employed is calculated – with or without financial leases included in the net debt position – Aeroflot produces an economic value that allows for ROCE to be higher than its cost of capital, which supports our positive view on the company.
Methods of Target Price Valuation
We used three methods to determine Aeroflot’s target price:
1. Present and future multiples relative to international peers;
2. DCF;
3. EBITDA multiple.
We have already demonstrated that the company is undervalued by more than 40% compared with GEM peers on this year’s multiples.
In our DCF model for Aeroflot for 2004—2010, we use a WACC of 14.3% as a discount rate. The DCF model built for the base-case scenario values the company at $1.20 per ordinary share for the end of 2004. This is our maximum for the fair value. Under DCF, 61% of the present EV comes from the perpetuity period.
Aeroflot DCF Model (Base Case Scenario)
For the WACC calculation, we used methodology, which determines the stock specific equity risk premium based on corporate governance rating (CGR) (1 being the lowest, 10 the highest). Our CGR for Aeroflot is 5.2. This compares with a 6.2 CGR for Baltika, 8.2 for Wimm-Bill-Dann, and 6.5 for SeverstalAvto. For the risk-free rate, we used a 3-month moving average on the mid yield on Russia’s 10-year sovereign bonds.
WACC Calculations
Another valuation method we used is an EV/EBITDA multiple-based calculation. As GEM peers have an average 2005E EBITDA multiple of 7.4, we use 7.0 for Aeroflot’s 2008E EBITDA multiple. The fair value derived from a 2008E EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.0 is $0.85.
We take $1.0 as our 12-month target price, which implies an 18% upside from the current price level.
Essential Vocabulary
1. target price
– целевая (базовая) цена2. working capital
– оборотный капитал3. Hold
– рекомендация «держать»4. projection
5. operating cash flow (OpCF)
– операционный денежный поток6. actual (A)
7. estimate (E)
8. forecast (F)
9. Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures (CUSIP)
– Комитет по единым процедурам идентификации ценных бумаг (США)10. International Securities Identification Numbers (ISIN)
– международные идентификационные номера ценных бумаг11. not available (
12. lease
lease
13. load
load
14. Russian Trading System (RTS)
– Российская торговая система15. schedule
schedule
16. par
on (at) par
– по номиналу, наравне17. Euro-zone
– зона евро18. base-case scenario
– базовый сценарий19. unleveraged
20. terminal value
– конечная (терминальная) ценность21. beta
– коэффициент бета (показатель относительной неустойчивости цен акций)Exercise 1. Answer the following questions.
1. Why did Renaissance Capital raise their target price for Aeroflot? 2. Was Aeroflot’s 2003 operating performance affected by the negative global air transportation environment? 3. How will its fleet upgrade affect Aeroflot’s market position? 4. What is the upside potential of Aeroflot, according to Renaissance Capital? 5. What are the key price drivers of Aeroflot? 6. What are the justified discounts for Aeroflot shares? 7. What are the GEM peers that are used for comparison with Aeroflot? 8. What methods did Renaissance Capital use to determine Aeroflot’s target price? 9. What methodology did it use for WACC calculation?
Exercise 2*. Find terms in the text that match definitions given below and make sentences of your own with each term.
1. a nine-digit identifier for securities traded in the United States
2. a method of estimating the value of an asset by taking the cash flows associated with the asset and discounting them for time and risk